We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
5.15 (latest release)
Windows
Linux Mint 22 (XFCE)
User can have two versions of the same entry based on whether it was imported from search result or imported from DOI.
Consider this article: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.13.10.2023.001. (I hope you won't be too scared of Ukrainian language 😄).
When searching in Crossref via title Важелі забезпечення ефективної цифрової трансформації України, it has this bib code:
Важелі забезпечення ефективної цифрової трансформації України
@Article{Клєвцєвич, author = {Наталія Клєвцєвич}, journal = {Grail of Science}, title = {ВАЖЕЛІ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ЕФЕКТИВНОЇ ЦИФРОВОЇ ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЇ УКРАЇНИ}, issn = {2710-3056}, number = {32}, pages = {25-28}, doi = {10.36074/grail-of-science.13.10.2023.001}, publisher = {European Scientific Platform (Publications)}, }
(I removed groups and file).
groups
file
But when you use the DOI, you have this result:
@Article{Клєвцєвич202310, author = {Наталія Клєвцєвич}, journal = {Grail of Science}, title = {ВАЖЕЛІ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ЕФЕКТИВНОЇ ЦИФРОВОЇ ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЇ УКРАЇНИ}, year = {2023}, issn = {2710-3056}, month = oct, number = {32}, pages = {25--28}, doi = {10.36074/grail-of-science.13.10.2023.001}, publisher = {European Scientific Platform (Publications)}, }
I found this issue when imported entries from search didn't have a year field.
But when I imported via DOI, year was there.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Starting point: https://devdocs.jabref.org/code-howtos/fetchers.html
Ages ago, there was a discussion of a fetcher pipeline:. Keep Fetchers focussed. - pipejplibe should use fetcher, use doi fetcher, merge.
Or other ID fetcher. At ISBN we build kind of that ...
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
JabRef version
5.15 (latest release)
Operating system
Windows
Details on version and operating system
Linux Mint 22 (XFCE)
Checked with the latest development build (copy version output from About dialog)
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
User can have two versions of the same entry based on whether it was imported from search result or imported from DOI.
Consider this article: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.13.10.2023.001. (I hope you won't be too scared of Ukrainian language 😄).
When searching in Crossref via title
Важелі забезпечення ефективної цифрової трансформації України
, it has this bib code:(I removed
groups
andfile
).But when you use the DOI, you have this result:
I found this issue when imported entries from search didn't have a year field.
But when I imported via DOI, year was there.
Appendix
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: