You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, there is a ligature for ?= but not for the symmetric case =? and not for the combined case =?=. Furthermore, the ligature ?= already looks like it could be incorporated into an arbitrary long arrow/equality, such as ?====, but this is not possible. Because currently ?= exists, =?= looks weird, because only the last two characters are combined.
The analogous ligatures =! and =!= for ! exist, and can be incorporated into arbitrary long arrows/equalities. It would be nice to have a similar behavior for ? in long equals sings. If this is not possible, it would be nice, to have a stylistic set for disabling the ligature ?=, such that =?= looks better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, there is a ligature for
?=
but not for the symmetric case=?
and not for the combined case=?=
. Furthermore, the ligature?=
already looks like it could be incorporated into an arbitrary long arrow/equality, such as?====
, but this is not possible. Because currently?=
exists,=?=
looks weird, because only the last two characters are combined.The analogous ligatures
=!
and=!=
for!
exist, and can be incorporated into arbitrary long arrows/equalities. It would be nice to have a similar behavior for?
in long equals sings. If this is not possible, it would be nice, to have a stylistic set for disabling the ligature?=
, such that=?=
looks better.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: