Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn a bunch of options by default #17442

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member

@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii commented Jul 24, 2024

Attempt to enable some parallel options (graph checking, ilxgen, resolution) by default.

Firstly, based on local tests, parallel ilxgen causes a bunch of baselines to change. This either caused by sorting before emitting/generating, which is fine. Or it's caused by trully parallel generation, which will break determinism.

Secondly, graph checking causes some things in tests to be not found during test (i'd wait for CI, to see exact issue).

I am very hesitant to enable graph checking by default, since it might cause typechecker just to fail in places it wasn't before, there might be (and probably will be) a bunch of cases where it will surface. What we can do is to have an msbuild property which will allow people to test it on more projects (or ask them to use --test: flag).

Regarding the ilxgen - we need a proof that codegen order is expected. If it's not, it has to be fixed, or always been disabled for the determinism.

I didn't find any anomalies in both ParallelReferenceResolution and OptimizationProcessingMode.Parallel yet.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 24, 2024

✅ No release notes required

@edgarfgp
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @vzarytovskii for looking into this. I failed in my attempt in #17400

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

A bunch of tests currently failing:

  1. Some fsi tests are failing because of locked dlls (I presume it's because parallel resolution)
  2. Some resolution tests are failing (it's either resolution or graph checking):
test3.fsx(109,106): error FS0001: The type 'TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'
  1. A test for same type in the different references is failing (due to either parallel resolution, or graph checking).

I will turn parallel resolution off and see what still fails.

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

vzarytovskii commented Jul 24, 2024

Majority of issues were due to parallel resolution it seems. Still doesn't explain why do I have weird issues in tests locally, but not in CI.

It's good. I will leave parallel ilxgen and resolution off, and graph type checking and optimization on, and leave it up to @KevinRansom and @T-Gro to decide whether we want them on by default. The latter should be fine, the former - we didn't test on many solutions (maybe 3-5 in the wild), so there's always a risk of things going wrong. There's now an opt-out mechanism though.

@T-Gro
Copy link
Member

T-Gro commented Jul 26, 2024

Majority of issues were due to parallel resolution it seems. Still doesn't explain why do I have weird issues in tests locally, but not in CI.

It's good. I will leave parallel ilxgen and resolution off, and graph type checking and optimization on, and leave it up to @KevinRansom and @T-Gro to decide whether we want them on by default. The latter should be fine, the former - we didn't test on many solutions (maybe 3-5 in the wild), so there's always a risk of things going wrong. There's now an opt-out mechanism though.

This exists already:
parallelIlxGenEnabled = tcConfig.parallelIlxGen && not tcConfig.deterministic

i.e. deterministic builds should not be affected.

@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii added the NO_RELEASE_NOTES Label for pull requests which signals, that user opted-out of providing release notes label Aug 12, 2024
@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready, apart from some output tests which will likely be failing. @nojaf @edgarfgp @dawedawe does this make sense to enable those options now, and the rest later? I need to investigate those a bit more. With these though, we will be having an opt-out at least.

@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii removed the NO_RELEASE_NOTES Label for pull requests which signals, that user opted-out of providing release notes label Aug 12, 2024
@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

@T-Gro @KevinRansom @abonie @psfinaki I need a sanity check on it. Also, a sign-off.

Copy link
Contributor

@nojaf nojaf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks for the follow-up.
I think it makes sense to include this for previews and release candidates.
This gives us enough time to reconsider the defaults before November if needed.

Directory.Build.props Show resolved Hide resolved
@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 18:30
@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii requested a review from a team as a code owner August 14, 2024 18:30
@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

So, two things broke when turning this on by default

  1. First looks like graph checking in topinit test:

fsc cfg "%s --realsig- --optimize -o both69514.exe -g" cfg.fsc_flags ["lib69514.fs"; "app69514.fs"]

module X
let v = global.Lib.File1.discState.Second
let v2 = global.Lib.File2.discState.Rep

namespace Lib
module File1 =
let mutable discState = System.DateTime.Now
module File2 =
[<Struct>]
type DiscState(rep : int) =
member this.Rep = rep
let mutable discState = DiscState(0)

Fails with:

app69514.fs(3,16): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'Lib' is not defined.


app69514.fs(5,17): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'Lib' is not defined.

  1. Not entirely sure yet, but also related to types resolution in diamondAssembly type provider test:

[<Test>]
let diamondAssembly () =
let cfg = testConfig "typeProviders/diamondAssembly"

test3.fsx(96,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(96,105): error FS0001: The type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(97,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(98,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(98,105): error FS0001: The type 'Test2b.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(99,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(101,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2b.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(101,105): error FS0001: The type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(102,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2b.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(103,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2b.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(103,105): error FS0001: The type 'Test2b.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(104,70): error FS0001: The type 'Test2b.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(107,106): error FS0001: The type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(109,106): error FS0001: The type 'TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(112,106): error FS0001: The type 'Test1.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


test3.fsx(114,106): error FS0001: The type 'TheGeneratedType5' is not compatible with the type 'Test2a.PublicGenerativeTypes.TheGeneratedType5'


Results:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=778074&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=19935626&resultId=100551&paneView=debug

@nojaf any pointers what to look at in this case?

@nojaf
Copy link
Contributor

nojaf commented Aug 16, 2024

@vzarytovskii , I'm gonna teach you a little trick, add the scenario to

and then run

[<TestCaseSource(nameof scenarios)>]
let ``Compile a valid scenario using graph-based type-checking`` (scenario: Scenario) =
compileAValidScenario scenario Method.Graph
[<TestCaseSource(nameof scenarios)>]
let ``Compile a valid scenario using sequential type-checking`` (scenario: Scenario) =
compileAValidScenario scenario Method.Sequential

if sequential passes and graph doesn't then it is indeed a graph problem.

I need to go now, but I can look into this on Monday.
Initial gut feeling is that we need to strip \global`` in:

SynLongIdent.SynLongIdent(
                                                id = [
                                                    Ident("`global`", R("(2,9--2,15)"))
                                                    Ident("Lib", R("(2,16--2,19)"))
                                                    Ident("File1", R("(2,20--2,25)"))
                                                    Ident("discState", R("(2,26--2,35)"))
                                                    Ident("Second", R("(2,36--2,42)"))
                                                ],
                                                dotRanges = [ R("(2,15--2,16)"); R("(2,19--2,20)"); R("(2,25--2,26)"); R("(2,35--2,36)") ],
                                                trivia = [ Some(IdentTrivia.OriginalNotation("global")); None; None; None; None ]
                                            ),

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

Initial gut feeling is that we need to strip \global`` in:

This what I initially noticed in the test. Let me try and tinker with it.

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

vzarytovskii commented Aug 16, 2024

Added test here: #17553, will look at fixing it (need to learn a bit more about how graph checking works).

@nojaf
Copy link
Contributor

nojaf commented Sep 13, 2024

Hi @vzarytovskii is the plan still to have this for November?

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

vzarytovskii commented Sep 13, 2024

Hi @vzarytovskii is the plan still to have this for November?

I will try to wrap it, but it might have to do in the following release. Too many issues with this release and didn't have time to finish this one :(

@nojaf
Copy link
Contributor

nojaf commented Sep 13, 2024

following release

Would that be minor or major?

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

following release

Would that be minor or major?

Minor, as soon as sdk freeze is lifted

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, probably not going to make it till EOD, there are some fixes need to be made to the graph checking, will look at those:

+++ Conformance\ImplementationFilesAndSignatureFiles\CheckingOfImplementationFiles (E-SignatureAfterSource) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc    E-SignatureAfterSource.fs E-SignatureAfterSource.fsi 
Exit code: 1
Error:     2
Microsoft (R) F# Compiler version 12.9.100.0 for F# 9.0
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
(4,8): error FS0248: Two modules named 'E-SignatureAfterSource' occur in two parts of this assembly
(8,1): warning FS0221: The declarations in this file will be placed in an implicit module 'E-SignatureAfterSource' based on the file name 'E-SignatureAfterSource.fsi'. However this is not a valid F# identifier, so the contents will not be accessible from other files. Consider renaming the file or adding a 'module' or 'namespace' declaration at the top of the file.
--------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft (R) F# Compiler version 12.9.100.0 for F# 9.0
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
(4,8): error FS0248: Two modules named 'E-SignatureAfterSource' occur in two parts of this assembly
(8,1): warning FS0221: The declarations in this file will be placed in an implicit module 'E-SignatureAfterSource' based on the file name 'E-SignatureAfterSource.fsi'. However this is not a valid F# identifier, so the contents will not be accessible from other files. Consider renaming the file or adding a 'module' or 'namespace' declaration at the top of the file.

*** The following necessary lines were never matched:
***	\(8,1\):.+error FS0238:.+An implementation of file or module 'E-SignatureAfterSource' has already been given\. Compilation order is significant in F# because of type inference\. You may need to adjust the order of your files to place the signature file before the implementation\. In Visual Studio files are type-checked in the order they appear in the project file, which can be edited manually or adjusted using the solution explorer

+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (VerbatimIdentifier01.fsx) +++
Compiling: [fsiAnyCPU<VerbatimIdentifier01.fsx   --nologo ]
Quantifier follows nothing in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/val ``(+ <-- HERE )`` : bool = true/ at D:\a\_work\1\s\tests\fsharpqa\source\run.pl line 212.
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution01_fsc) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution02_fsc) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution03_fsc) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution04_fsc) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution05_fsc) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution01_fscrelative) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution02_fscrelative) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution03_fscrelative) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution04_fscrelative) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution05_fscrelative) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution01_fscsimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution02_fscsimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution03_fscsimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution04_fscsimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution05_fscsimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution01_fscrelativesimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution01_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution02_fscrelativesimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution02_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution02_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution03_fscrelativesimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx ]

ccc\RelativeHashRResolution03_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution03_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution04_fscrelativesimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution04_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution04_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL
+++ InteractiveSession\Misc (RelativeHashRResolution05_fscrelativesimple) +++
--------------------------------------------------------
Results from hosted compiler
msg: Compiling
cmd: fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx 
Exit code: 1
Error:     0
(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
--------------------------------------------------------
Compiling: [fsc   --nologo --simpleresolution --noframework -r:"D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\fsc\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.dll" ..\Misc\aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx ]

aaa\bbb\RelativeHashRResolution05_1.fsx(8,14): error FS0039: The value, namespace, type or module 'RelativeHashRResolution05_2' is not defined.
Compile Unexpectedly Failed: 256 
FAIL




@nojaf
Copy link
Contributor

nojaf commented Sep 13, 2024

What tests are you running there? Is that only using graph-based checking or all settings?

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

vzarytovskii commented Sep 13, 2024

What tests are you running there? Is that only using graph-based checking or all settings?

Those are fsharpqa tests, RelativeHashRResolution01_1.fsx (and others from log, there are a few files there, mostly I see fsx files), it's all settings which are on by default now - graph checking and parallel optimizations.

Seems like many of them are related to relative # resolution ("#I/#r" I presume?).

@nojaf
Copy link
Contributor

nojaf commented Sep 13, 2024

Could you try and just run it with graph checking. I'm wondering if that really is the culprit.

@vzarytovskii
Copy link
Member Author

Could you try and just run it with graph checking. I'm wondering if that really is the culprit.

Will try it, but it's unlikely an optimizer, since the issues are during checking and resolution. Optimizer ones would've popped up at a later phase. Also i think that by default fsharpqa is compiling debug/without optimizations. I will double check it though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants