Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace more alternate characters in format_skeleton #1122

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tomasr8
Copy link
Contributor

@tomasr8 tomasr8 commented Aug 22, 2024

Related discussion: #1084

Replaces some additional characters which never appear in resource files before matching the skeleton. This replicates the behaviour of ICU: https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/blob/5e22f0076ec9b55056cd8a84e9ef370632f44174/icu4j/main/core/src/main/java/com/ibm/icu/text/DateIntervalInfo.java#L1090-L1102

Replaces some additional characters which never appear
in resource files before matching the skeleton. This
replicates the behaviour of ICU.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.24%. Comparing base (cf7d223) to head (bfb5e3d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1122      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.22%   91.24%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        4561     4569       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         4161     4169       +8     
  Misses        400      400              
Flag Coverage Δ
macos-12-3.10 90.04% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
macos-12-3.11 89.97% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
macos-12-3.12 90.15% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
macos-12-3.13-dev 89.66% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
macos-12-3.8 89.96% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
macos-12-3.9 89.96% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
macos-12-pypy3.10 90.04% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-3.10 90.06% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-3.11 89.99% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-3.12 90.17% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-3.13-dev 89.69% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-3.8 89.99% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-3.9 89.99% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ubuntu-22.04-pypy3.10 90.06% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-3.10 90.18% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-3.11 90.11% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-3.12 90.29% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-3.13-dev 89.81% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-3.8 90.11% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-3.9 90.11% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022-pypy3.10 90.18% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines 1891 to +1900
if 'z' in skeleton and not any('z' in option for option in options):
skeleton = skeleton.replace('z', 'v')
if 'k' in skeleton and not any('k' in option for option in options):
skeleton = skeleton.replace('k', 'H')
if 'K' in skeleton and not any('K' in option for option in options):
skeleton = skeleton.replace('K', 'h')
if 'a' in skeleton and not any('a' in option for option in options):
skeleton = skeleton.replace('a', '')
if 'b' in skeleton and not any('b' in option for option in options):
skeleton = skeleton.replace('b', '')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I smell a performance issue 😄 We'd now be doing 5 x O(n) lookups over skeleton.

I suggest something like:

  • make the special skeleton character mapping a module-level dict ({'z': 'v', 'k': 'H', 'K': 'h', 'a': '', 'b': ''})
  • derive a module-level frozenset of the keys there
  • do a first "early" check if set(skeleton) & special_skeleton_frozen_set: to see if we need to do any work regarding these
  • ... and if yes, loop over the actual mapping and process the replacements as necessary.

This should probably be benchmarked, though.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was also a bit worried about that, I'll run some benchmarks so we can compare

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok here are some results. FTR I'm measuring the current PR against this diff, lmk if this is not what you meant :)

diff --git a/babel/dates.py b/babel/dates.py
index 25e66d5..442e805 100644
--- a/babel/dates.py
+++ b/babel/dates.py
@@ -1855,6 +1855,9 @@ def split_interval_pattern(pattern: str) -> list[str]:
     return [untokenize_pattern(tokens) for tokens in parts]
 
 
+alternate_chars = {'z': 'v', 'k': 'H', 'K': 'h', 'a': '', 'b': ''}
+alternate_chars_set = frozenset(alternate_chars.keys())
+
 def match_skeleton(skeleton: str, options: Iterable[str], allow_different_fields: bool = False) -> str | None:
     """
     Find the closest match for the given datetime skeleton among the options given.
@@ -1888,16 +1891,10 @@ def match_skeleton(skeleton: str, options: Iterable[str], allow_different_fields
     # Filter out falsy values and sort for stability; when `interval_formats` is passed in, there may be a None key.
     options = sorted(option for option in options if option)
 
-    if 'z' in skeleton and not any('z' in option for option in options):
-        skeleton = skeleton.replace('z', 'v')
-    if 'k' in skeleton and not any('k' in option for option in options):
-        skeleton = skeleton.replace('k', 'H')
-    if 'K' in skeleton and not any('K' in option for option in options):
-        skeleton = skeleton.replace('K', 'h')
-    if 'a' in skeleton and not any('a' in option for option in options):
-        skeleton = skeleton.replace('a', '')
-    if 'b' in skeleton and not any('b' in option for option in options):
-        skeleton = skeleton.replace('b', '')
+    if set(skeleton) & alternate_chars_set:
+        for char, replacement in alternate_chars.items():
+            if char in skeleton and not any(char in option for option in options):
+                skeleton = skeleton.replace(char, replacement)
 
     get_input_field_width = dict(t[1] for t in tokenize_pattern(skeleton) if t[0] == "field").get
     best_skeleton = None

I benchmarked two skeletons, one containing a replacement char, and one not: Hmz, yMMd.
This is the benchmark code:

# skeleton.py
from babel.dates import match_skeleton
from babel import Locale

locale = Locale.parse('en_GB')
# skeleton = 'Hmz'
skeleton = 'yMMd'
assert skeleton not in locale.datetime_skeletons

for _ in range(1000):
    match_skeleton(skeleton, locale.datetime_skeletons)

Results:

For yMMd

hyperfine 'git checkout format-skeleton && python skeleton.py' 'git checkout format-skeleton-optimized && python skeleton.py'

Benchmark 1: git checkout format-skeleton && python skeleton.py
  Time (mean ± σ):     308.1 ms ±   7.2 ms    [User: 290.7 ms, System: 17.3 ms]
  Range (min … max):   292.9 ms … 318.0 ms    10 runs
 
Benchmark 2: git checkout format-skeleton-optimized && python skeleton.py
  Time (mean ± σ):     314.3 ms ±   9.9 ms    [User: 296.6 ms, System: 17.6 ms]
  Range (min … max):   297.8 ms … 333.4 ms    10 runs
 
Summary
  'git checkout format-skeleton && python skeleton.py' ran
    1.02 ± 0.04 times faster than 'git checkout format-skeleton-optimized && python skeleton.py'

For Hmz:

hyperfine 'git checkout format-skeleton && python skeleton.py' 'git checkout format-skeleton-optimized && python skeleton.py'

Benchmark 1: git checkout format-skeleton && python skeleton.py
  Time (mean ± σ):     204.5 ms ±  11.5 ms    [User: 187.4 ms, System: 16.9 ms]
  Range (min … max):   188.8 ms … 228.3 ms    13 runs
 
Benchmark 2: git checkout format-skeleton-optimized && python skeleton.py
  Time (mean ± σ):     205.8 ms ±   9.2 ms    [User: 189.3 ms, System: 16.4 ms]
  Range (min … max):   192.3 ms … 220.0 ms    13 runs
 
Summary
  'git checkout format-skeleton && python skeleton.py' ran
    1.01 ± 0.07 times faster than 'git checkout format-skeleton-optimized && python skeleton.py'

Looks like the optimized version using the set check is actually a bit slower 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

friendly reminder @akx :) Which version should we go with?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants